The Effects of Repetition on Preferences
Tuesday, June 10th, 2008As some of you already know (since you were participants), I recently conducted a little pilot study to investigate some aspects of music cognition. My main focus was how different levels of repetition factored into a listener’s preference for a song. In other words, if a certain part of a song is repeated more or less often, does this change affect how much you like or dislike a song?
In popular music, I think we can take for granted that the repetition of portions of a song is one of the basic tools that songwriters use to structure their tunes: “second verse, same as the first.” The chorus of a song, for instance, often reappears exactly the same way at multiple points in the song: lyrics, harmony, melody, instrumentation are all identical from iteration to iteration. Does it matter, then, how often these identical parts get repeated?

I don’t think it’s too much of a stretch to say that at some point, we as listeners would get bored with a song that repeated the same section over and over without any change. Of course, many songs have repetitive harmonic structures, but often a balance is negotiated (in a good song) by having other domains change and thus add interest: melodies get embellished, instruments get added, rhythms change. It’s this balance of variety versus unity – a balance that lots of composers talk about – that keeps our interest in a song. For a stripped down guitar/vocal arrangement, there is going to be more pressure for harmonic and melodic variation than were more instruments involved.






