<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Supertonic in Nirvana&#8217;s Nevermind</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.midside.com/2007/02/18/nirvana_supertonic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.midside.com/2007/02/18/nirvana_supertonic/</link>
	<description>popular music theory, analysis, and criticism</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 10:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: trevordeclercq</title>
		<link>http://www.midside.com/2007/02/18/nirvana_supertonic/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>trevordeclercq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 12:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midside.com/blog/?p=12#comment-140</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the response, Sylvain.  I hope to do more posts on Nirvana in the future.  Feel free to make suggestions on any topics you think would be interesting.  Sorry I haven't posted in awhile....just been a little bogged down with schoolwork this semester.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the response, Sylvain.  I hope to do more posts on Nirvana in the future.  Feel free to make suggestions on any topics you think would be interesting.  Sorry I haven&#8217;t posted in awhile&#8230;.just been a little bogged down with schoolwork this semester.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sylvain</title>
		<link>http://www.midside.com/2007/02/18/nirvana_supertonic/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>sylvain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 06:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midside.com/blog/?p=12#comment-138</guid>
		<description>oh hell yeah, great post.  Nirvana is one of my favorites and it's a shame that every "musical look" into the band simplay talks about influence and puts down the music.  I love how Nirvana uses interesting chords, melodies, and solos and I can't wait to hear more that you gleam from them.

thanks!
s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh hell yeah, great post.  Nirvana is one of my favorites and it&#8217;s a shame that every &#8220;musical look&#8221; into the band simplay talks about influence and puts down the music.  I love how Nirvana uses interesting chords, melodies, and solos and I can&#8217;t wait to hear more that you gleam from them.</p>
<p>thanks!<br />
s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trevordeclercq</title>
		<link>http://www.midside.com/2007/02/18/nirvana_supertonic/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>trevordeclercq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 23:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midside.com/blog/?p=12#comment-82</guid>
		<description>Gotta say that I agree with you, Mitch.  I updated the post to reflect your observation.  I had maybe listened a little too casually.  The main vocal part is alternating between F# and G-natural, which are the ^5 and ^b6 of B, so I think I just assumed it was a minor chord based on the flat-6 neighbor note in the vocal line.  

But the chords are really just power chords.  In fact, if anything, I might go out on a limb to say that the B was a major chord instead of a minor chord based on the overtones that the power chord is creating.  It's probably more harmonically interesting, too, to have a B-major chord with the minor inflection in the vocal part.  There is really a whole lot more to talk about with Nirvana and melody/harmony; hopefully I'll get a chance to dig deeper later on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta say that I agree with you, Mitch.  I updated the post to reflect your observation.  I had maybe listened a little too casually.  The main vocal part is alternating between F# and G-natural, which are the ^5 and ^b6 of B, so I think I just assumed it was a minor chord based on the flat-6 neighbor note in the vocal line.  </p>
<p>But the chords are really just power chords.  In fact, if anything, I might go out on a limb to say that the B was a major chord instead of a minor chord based on the overtones that the power chord is creating.  It&#8217;s probably more harmonically interesting, too, to have a B-major chord with the minor inflection in the vocal part.  There is really a whole lot more to talk about with Nirvana and melody/harmony; hopefully I&#8217;ll get a chance to dig deeper later on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://www.midside.com/2007/02/18/nirvana_supertonic/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 15:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midside.com/blog/?p=12#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Good post as always, Trevi.
My ears aren't as finely-tuned as yours, but I don't hear that minor 3rd on the B in "Drain You." Sounds to me like they're just playing the power chord from  D to B. But maybe that's just because the vocal harmonies are masking it (I can't imagine Nirvana ever singing that 3rd in the vocals—it would sound too wimpy).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post as always, Trevi.<br />
My ears aren&#8217;t as finely-tuned as yours, but I don&#8217;t hear that minor 3rd on the B in &#8220;Drain You.&#8221; Sounds to me like they&#8217;re just playing the power chord from  D to B. But maybe that&#8217;s just because the vocal harmonies are masking it (I can&#8217;t imagine Nirvana ever singing that 3rd in the vocals—it would sound too wimpy).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trevordeclercq</title>
		<link>http://www.midside.com/2007/02/18/nirvana_supertonic/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>trevordeclercq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 21:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midside.com/blog/?p=12#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Glad you enjoyed the post, Xtian.  

Mashing up those last two songs was pretty tricky, but now that I've done it once, future mash-ups should be easier.  I really should buy some higher quality time-stretching/pitch-shifting software.

I think I maybe had a little too much technical gobbledygook in the last post.  Did I spell gobbledygook correctly?

Ho-tally!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you enjoyed the post, Xtian.  </p>
<p>Mashing up those last two songs was pretty tricky, but now that I&#8217;ve done it once, future mash-ups should be easier.  I really should buy some higher quality time-stretching/pitch-shifting software.</p>
<p>I think I maybe had a little too much technical gobbledygook in the last post.  Did I spell gobbledygook correctly?</p>
<p>Ho-tally!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://www.midside.com/2007/02/18/nirvana_supertonic/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.midside.com/blog/?p=12#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Hey Trev,

Great post. It's great fun to see and hear you applying your fancy-schmancy music theory to all of this great pop music, and helping us more simple-minded folk to understand why we love this music. 

The mash-up is a nice addition, and another effective way of illustrating these musical similarities and consistencies. Good show. 

Tally-ho.

Christian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Trev,</p>
<p>Great post. It&#8217;s great fun to see and hear you applying your fancy-schmancy music theory to all of this great pop music, and helping us more simple-minded folk to understand why we love this music. </p>
<p>The mash-up is a nice addition, and another effective way of illustrating these musical similarities and consistencies. Good show. </p>
<p>Tally-ho.</p>
<p>Christian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
